I’ve
been wondering what the legalities are about sculpting someone famous and
selling their likeness. I mean common sense says there has to be some
protection of freedom of speech, which is what art is. But celebrities are the
ones with the money. There is that saying; those that have the gold make the
rules. Well, I’m a rebel. I figure there must be some away around that gold for
someone like me who isn’t going to make anywhere near what they make and
certainly be no threat to their income off of similar images, or in my case;
sculpture.
My first attempt at sculpting a
famous person went rather well, but I had no plans to sell it because she is a
Hungarian actress, Andrea Osvart, and not a lot of Americans even know who she
is. The sculpture turned out pretty good. Not perfect. The clay was new to me
and too soft, but quite frankly doing a portrait sculpture was simply pushing
the envelope for me at the time. In fact it’s still hard to do, but I’m more
confident about it now.
I posted a link to the picture on
her fan site on facebook. She took a look and actually wrote me a very nice
note saying she was honored that I did that, and posted the picture on her fan
page. And to show how nice she is, she added me to her personal facebook page.
Andrea Osvart |
Also on another personal note, the
angel pilot sculpture I did, since it was inspired by Yvonne Scio who was in
Tal Bachman’s music video; She’s so High, I put a picture of that up on her fan
page on facebook. She “liked” it from her personal page.
So far things have worked out pretty
well for me regarding celebrities, and yes, these two are not considered super-stars
here in the US, but it shows they weren’t ruined by success, they were very
nice. And I wasn’t making any money off of it, but I don’t think they would
care.
So what happens when you make money off
of a celebrity’s likeness? First of all you make money and second of all you
may be sued by them. I read an interesting legal paper about sports figures and
sport figure sculptures and how it has worked out in the courts. You can read the
whole thing here: http://www.willamette.edu/wucl/pdf/sportslaw/spring05/mcmillens.pdf
I’m
going to talk about the highlights of the cases in that paper.
The
basic problem always seems to be a balance between what is allowable free
speech on the part of the artist, and how that affects the right of publicity
for the celebrity. Right of publicity, as you might guess, is all that
licensing they do of their image and name. Do you have to have their permission
to make any likeness of them? From the above linked paper:
In Comedy III Prod., Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc.,
the California Supreme Court fashioned
Its own
balancing test to determine when a work of art outweighs a celebrity’s right of
publicity. When an artist’s skill and talent is
manifestly subordinated to the overall goal of creating a conventional portrait
of a celebrity so as to commercially exploit his or her fame, then the artist’s
right of free expression is outweighed by the right of publicity. An artist
depicting a celebrity must contribute something more than merely trivial
variation, [but must create] something recognizably his own.
This was a California case, which
would apply only to California, but could be cited as an authority in your
state, whatever that state might be. In this case an artist made t-shirts with
the Three Stooges on them from his own drawing. The court said it wasn’t
artistic enough, basically.
Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major
League Baseball Players Ass.n, 95 F.3d 959 (10th Cir. 1996).
This is a 10th
Circuit case which is above the State level, the final level before the U.S.
Supreme Court, and again can be cited as an authority in your state even if you
aren’t part of the 10th Circuit, and I forget where that is. I used
to know. I know I live in the 9th Circuit which has a reputation for
just making up crap as they go along, and sometimes, surprisingly, making a
good decision.
Anyway, in this
case a company was making trading cards ridiculing baseball players, I guess as
caricatures. The court found that the Oklahoma law protecting the right of
publicity was too protecting and that society would be deprived of
entertainment and social commentary, and the baseball players stood to benefit
very little from it.
Where this puts
us is; if you get sued, it’s up to the Judge to decide if your art is artsy
enough. And the argument that a perfect likeness takes incredible talent and
time and is the highest form of art, doesn’t count. Or it may count. Each case
is different. That argument hasn’t worked in the past, but it may in the future
with different circumstances and different judges.
My personal
opinion: I would not sculpt other people’s artwork. For instance all the comic
book heroes, at least not without permission. It’s going to be pretty hard to
say you are making art that is different in a very different way when you are
copying them. Duh. Secondly I don’t want to copy someone else’s artwork.
Creativity isn’t copying.
Sculpting a
celebrity is different. People look up to them, or admire their talent, and/or
their beauty and I don’t see what’s wrong with immortalizing that in a
sculpture. I don’t stand to make nearly what they make from their talent and
publicity. Even if I make a sculpture of say, Angelina Jolie, and I make 20 of
them and sell each one for $2,000 (similar case in that legal paper) $40,000 is
a drop in the bucket to her. She probably makes that much in 10 minutes. Quite
frankly if that caught her attention and she wanted her cut, I don’t care. It is
true I wouldn’t be making anything off of it if it weren’t for her fame. If she
demanded I stop because she thought it was a terrible sculpture, ok, it is her
likeness. I’m reasonable. That doesn’t mean everyone else is reasonable, or
that being reasonable would keep me out of court. Remember a woman sued
McDonald’s for spilling coffee on herself. Court sucks, you never know what
will happen in court, try to avoid it.
I’m going to go
see if I can sculpt Alison Krauss. She looks like a nice person.If you don't know who Alison Krauss is, here's a video, relax and take your mind off the stinking legal system.